Comparing methods for monitoring nest debris using silver gulls as a case study
April 1, 2022
Gabrielle E Henderson, Megan L Grant, Jennifer L. Lavers
Global plastics production is increasing exponentially and contributing to significant pollution of the marine environment. Of particular concern is ingestion and entanglement risks for marine wildlife, including when items such as rope are incorporated into nest structures. These events are commonly documented using photographic and visual surveys, and each presents a number of challenges and benefits for species conservation and monitoring. Here we compare an invasive (i.e., removing debris from nests) and non-invasive (i.e., photographs) sampling method for quantifying nest debris using the silver gull (Chroicocephalus novahollandiae) as a case study. Overall, 17 debris items were detected in 9% of gull nests. While the use of photographs to monitor nest debris is increasingly popular, the invasive method detected one additional debris item not identified using photography. We therefore recommend caution for nest debris and other monitoring programs where identifying small or cryptic items may require a high level of skill.
Recent publications
-
Surveillance of migratory shorebirds and seabirds in 2024 in Australia reveals incursions of a diversity of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses, but Not High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza H5N1
-
Plastic ingestion and body condition of Wedge-tailed Shearwaters in Vanuatu
-
First evidence of bidirectional exchange between distant humpback whale breeding populations in eastern Australia and Brazil
-
A novel blood biomarker for plastic ingestion in fledgling Procellariiform seabirds